Iraq And Iran War: Unpacking The Victor And Lasting Legacies
The Seeds of Conflict: A Century of Tensions
The animosity between Iraq and Iran was not a sudden eruption but the culmination of decades, if not centuries, of simmering tensions. **Tensions between Iran and Iraq began almost immediately after the establishment of the latter nation in 1921, in the aftermath of World War I**, when the British mandate carved out the modern state of Iraq from the remnants of the Ottoman Empire. This new entity shared a long, often disputed border with Persia (later Iran), a nation with a rich, ancient history and a distinct cultural and religious identity. One of the most enduring sources of conflict revolved around the Shatt al-Arab waterway, known as Arvand Rud in Iran. This vital artery, formed by the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, serves as a crucial outlet to the Persian Gulf for both nations. Control over its navigation and surrounding territories became a perpetual point of contention, leading to numerous border skirmishes and diplomatic crises throughout the 20th century. **By the 1970s, one enduring source of conflict** was indeed this waterway, along with broader issues of regional hegemony and ethnic minorities, particularly the Kurds, who straddled the border and were often used as proxies by both sides. The intricate web of historical claims, coupled with a lack of clearly demarcated borders and the strategic importance of oil-rich regions, laid a volatile foundation for future confrontation.The Spark: Revolution and Invasion
The immediate catalyst for the Iran-Iraq War was the Iranian Revolution of 1979. This seismic event, which overthrew the Western-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and established a Shiʿi Islamic government, sent shockwaves throughout the Middle East. **Relations with Iran had grown increasingly strained after the Shah was overthrown in 1979**, as the new revolutionary regime, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, fundamentally challenged the existing regional order. Saddam Hussein, Iraq's ambitious and authoritarian leader, saw the revolution as both a threat and an opportunity. He feared the revolutionary fervor of Iran's new Shiʿi government, which he believed could incite Iraq's own Shiʿi majority against his Sunni-dominated Baʿathist regime. Simultaneously, he perceived Iran as weakened and vulnerable in the immediate aftermath of its revolution, particularly after purges within its military. This presented a chance to assert Iraqi dominance in the Gulf, seize control of the Shatt al-Arab, and potentially annex oil-rich territories. **The war stemmed from a complex mix of historical grievances, ethnic tensions, and political upheavals, particularly following the Iranian Revolution of 1979, which established a theocratic government under Ayatollah Khomeini.** Saddam also harbored a deep personal animosity towards Khomeini and sought to position Iraq as the leading Arab power. While **Iraq recognized Iran’s new Shiʿi Islamic government**, the reality was that **the Iranian leaders would have nothing to do with the Baʿath regime, which they denounced as secular** and oppressive. Indeed, **Ruhollah Khomeini, the spiritual leader of the Iranian Revolution, proclaimed his policy of exporting the revolution**, a direct challenge to the legitimacy of secular Arab governments like Saddam's. It was against this backdrop of simmering resentment and escalating rhetoric that the invasion occurred. **The war began when Iraq, under dictator Saddam Hussein, invaded Iran under Ayatollah [Khomeini] on 22 September 1980, after a long history of border disputes and after Iran demanded the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime.** Saddam abrogated the 1975 Algiers Agreement, which had settled some border disputes, and launched a full-scale invasion, expecting a swift victory. He was gravely mistaken.The Brutal Eight-Year Stalemate
What Saddam Hussein anticipated would be a quick, decisive victory turned into one of the longest and bloodiest conventional wars of the 20th century. The initial Iraqi advance was met with fierce and unexpected resistance from a revolutionary Iran, whose forces, though disorganized, were fueled by intense ideological zeal. The war quickly devolved into a brutal trench warfare reminiscent of World War I, characterized by massive human waves, chemical weapons attacks (primarily by Iraq), and relentless artillery bombardments. The human cost was staggering. **Estimates of total casualties range from one million to twice that number**, a horrific toll that speaks to the sheer brutality and scale of the conflict. Both sides suffered immense losses, with young conscripts and volunteers thrown into the meat grinder of the front lines. Iran, driven by a religious fervor and a sense of national defense, mobilized vast numbers of volunteers, including child soldiers, under the banner of martyrdom. **Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa declaring that the war must be won by March**, underscoring the revolutionary government's unwavering determination, even in the face of overwhelming odds and international isolation. Despite Iraq's initial territorial gains, Iran gradually pushed back, eventually reclaiming most of its lost territory and even taking the fight onto Iraqi soil. The war became a war of attrition, with neither side able to achieve a decisive breakthrough. International efforts to mediate a peace were largely unsuccessful, as both leaders, Saddam Hussein and Ayatollah Khomeini, remained intransigent, unwilling to concede defeat or compromise. The global community, while condemning the use of chemical weapons, often turned a blind eye to the conflict, with many nations providing covert or overt support to one side or the other based on their own geopolitical interests.The Ceasefire and Lingering Questions of Victory
The Iran-Iraq War finally came to an end on August 20, 1988, with the acceptance of UN Security Council Resolution 598. **Fighting was ended by a 1988 ceasefire, though the resumption of normal diplomatic relations and the withdrawal of troops did not take place until 1990.** This delayed normalization highlighted the deep mistrust and unresolved issues that lingered even after the cessation of hostilities. So, **who won the Iraq and Iran War**? The consensus among historians and analysts is that there was no clear victor. Both nations emerged from the conflict profoundly scarred, economically devastated, and politically unstable. It was, in essence, a "victory of survival" for Iran, and a "pyrrhic victory" for Iraq, if it could even be called that.Iraq's Pyrrhic Gains and Losses
Saddam Hussein's initial objectives—to seize the Shatt al-Arab, annex territory, and assert regional dominance—were largely unmet. While he managed to hold onto the Shatt al-Arab's navigation rights, the cost was astronomical. Iraq's economy was crippled by war debt, much of it owed to Gulf Arab states, which would later become a pretext for the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Saddam's military, though battle-hardened, was exhausted, and his regime was left with a massive internal debt and a population weary of war. The war did consolidate his power domestically, but at the expense of national prosperity and stability.Iran's Resilience and Sacrifices
For Iran, the war was a test of its revolutionary resolve. Despite immense human and material losses, the Islamic Republic survived, its borders intact. The war fostered a strong sense of national unity and martyrdom, reinforcing the revolutionary ideology. However, the economic cost was staggering, and Iran faced years of reconstruction under international sanctions. The dream of exporting the revolution, initially a driving force, was tempered by the brutal realities of war. The conflict also led to a more militarized society and a strengthened role for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).The Aftermath: A Shattered Iraq
The long-term consequences of the Iran-Iraq War were particularly devastating for Iraq. While Saddam Hussein declared victory, the reality was a nation teetering on the brink of economic collapse. His aggressive foreign policy, fueled by the perceived need to repay war debts and project strength, directly led to the 1990 invasion of Kuwait and the subsequent Gulf War (1991), which further decimated Iraq's infrastructure and military. The cumulative impact of these conflicts, especially the 2003 US-led invasion and the subsequent occupation, ultimately led to the downfall of Saddam's regime and plunged Iraq into prolonged instability. It is in this context that the statement, **"As for Iraq being any sort of winner after being stomped on by the U.S,"** becomes profoundly relevant. The Iran-Iraq War weakened Iraq, making it vulnerable to later interventions. The subsequent years saw Iraq's civil society shredded, a nation undergoing eight years of sectarian civil war, and seeing over 100,000 killed, a direct consequence of the instability and power vacuum created by decades of conflict, starting with the Iran-Iraq War. The focus of the **U.S. Army in the Iraq War, which examines U.S.** military operations, underscores how Iraq's internal fragility, partly a legacy of the Iran-Iraq War, became a significant factor in subsequent regional conflicts.The Cost of Survival for Iran
Iran, too, faced a challenging post-war landscape. While its revolutionary government survived, it did so at a tremendous cost. Decades of international sanctions, partly a consequence of its nuclear program and regional activities, have hampered its economic development. The war also solidified a hardline political establishment, wary of external interference and committed to self-reliance. The experience of the Iran-Iraq War continues to shape Iran's strategic thinking, emphasizing defensive capabilities and asymmetric warfare.A New Chapter? Iran-Iraq Relations Today
Despite the bitter history, there has been a noticeable shift in relations between the two former adversaries. **More than four decades after the beginning of a dreadful war that shaped the lives and worldview of a generation, Iraq and Iran seem to have put the past behind them and moved to a new relationship.** This rapprochement is driven by several factors, including Iraq's Shiʿi-majority government's natural alignment with Shiʿi Iran, shared economic interests, and a common desire for regional stability, albeit on their own terms. However, **the road ahead is not without landmines**. The relationship remains complex, influenced by internal Iraqi politics, regional power dynamics, and the ongoing geopolitical rivalry between Iran and the United States. **The balance of power is too lopsided in Iran’s favor to allow for a healthy alliance, and Iran’s continued estrangement from the U.S. makes Baghdad’s** position delicate. Iraq finds itself caught between its powerful neighbor and its Western allies, striving to maintain sovereignty while navigating competing influences.Regional Dynamics and External Pressures
The broader regional context continues to exert significant pressure on Iran-Iraq relations. Iran's nuclear program, its support for various non-state actors, and its ongoing tensions with Israel and the United States remain flashpoints. Recent events underscore this volatility: **Diplomacy with Iran can “easily” be started again if US President Donald Trump orders Israel’s leadership to stop striking the country, an official with the Iranian presidency told CNN.** This quote, though from a specific political moment, illustrates the interconnectedness of regional conflicts and the influence of external powers. Similarly, news of military actions, such as **on the evening of June 12, Israel launched a series of major strikes against Iran, The targets included Iranian nuclear facilities, missile sites, and multiple senior military and political officials, In a televised speech, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared success**, highlights the persistent shadow of conflict and the complex security environment in which Iran and Iraq operate. These external pressures mean that while bilateral relations may improve, the region as a whole remains volatile, with the potential for new conflicts always lurking beneath the surface.Beyond Victory: The Enduring Legacy of the Iran-Iraq War
In retrospect, the question of "who won the Iraq and Iran War" becomes less about a military triumph and more about the enduring consequences. Neither side achieved its strategic objectives without incurring catastrophic costs. Iraq gained little but debt and a weakened state, paving the way for future invasions and internal strife. Iran, while preserving its revolutionary government, paid an immense price in human lives and economic development. The Iran-Iraq War stands as a stark reminder of the devastating human cost of unresolved grievances and unbridled ambition. It shaped the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East for decades, influencing the rise of new regional powers, the proliferation of non-state actors, and the persistent cycle of conflict. The war did not produce a winner in the traditional sense, but rather left a legacy of trauma, instability, and a deeply altered regional order that continues to unfold.Conclusion
The "Iraq and Iran War Who Won" remains a complex and poignant question with no simple answer. The eight-year conflict was a brutal stalemate, a testament to the futility of war when core objectives are not met and the human cost becomes immeasurable. Both nations endured unimaginable suffering, leaving behind a legacy of millions of casualties, shattered economies, and deep-seated societal scars. While Iraq's initial invasion failed to achieve a decisive victory, and Iran's revolutionary government survived, neither could truly claim triumph. The war fundamentally reshaped the internal dynamics of both countries and profoundly influenced the broader Middle East. Understanding this devastating chapter of history is crucial for appreciating the current complexities of the region and the ongoing quest for stability. What are your thoughts on the long-term impact of the Iran-Iraq War? Share your perspectives in the comments below, or explore our other articles on regional conflicts and their historical contexts.
History of Syria | Britannica
Iraq - United States Department of State
Travel to Iraq in 2025: Federal Iraq + Kurdistan
